
Irrigation
Notes
California State
University, Fresno, California 93740-0018
June 1990
Computer Software
for Irrigation Scheduling
By David F. Zoldoske
What's the best way to determine when and how much
to irrigate? The old way was to do a lot of field testing, take
a look at the weather and the crop, combine that with seat of
the pants experience, and make your best estimate. The new way
is to load an irrigation scheduling program into your computer,
feed it the data, and let it give you some answers.
WHY SCHEDULE IRRIGATIONS?
Other than to impress their neighbors, why should
growers use this new technology to schedule irrigation? To put
it in a nutshell, because it is a better, more efficient way to
operate.
Many growers who do not use crop related irrigation
scheduling often over- or under-irrigate. This can reduce the
profitability of any farming operation. The cost of over-irrigating
includes additional water, higher fuel or electricity use, more
pump maintenance, more labor, and increased drainage and possibly
salinity problems that can eventually lead to yield reduction
. Under-irrigation reduces yield and quality, and can lead to
total crop loss.
Additional costs come in the form of downtime when
irrigation conflicts with spraying, harvesting, or other cultural
practices.
The cost of over-irrigating includes additional
water, higher fuel or electricity use, more pump maintenance,
more labor, and increased drainage and possible salinity problems
that can eventually lead to yield reduction.
Computer aided irrigation scheduling is a process
that uses field measurements to predict irrigation needs and schedule
irrigation. Field measurements or data come in a variety of forms.
Soil moisture level, for example, can
be measured by soil feel test, where the soil type and grower's
experience will indicate the relative amount of moisture in the
soil. Soil moisture measuring devices, such as tensiometers or
electrical resistance blocks, could be used instead. This data
is used by the computer to schedule irrigations, and to verify
computer-predicted soil moisture levels.
Daily or weekly weather data is used
to compute the plants' evapotranspiration (ET) rate. The ET rate
is a combination of water loss from cropped area into the atmosphere
from two sources: evaporation from the soil (E) and transpiration
from the plant surface (T). The ET information is used to predict
crop water requirements.
The reference ETo figures are delivered to the ATI-Net
system through computer linkup with the California Department
of Water Resources in Sacramento. The DWR's California Irrigation
Management Information System (CIMIS) obtains the figures daily
from more than 60 computerized weather stations located around
the state.
ETo and other information provided by ATI-Net is
available to the public at no charge. Linkup to the system requires
a microcomputer or terminal with communications software and a
modem installed on a telephone line. Depending on the user's proximity
to one of 20 CSU, Fresno campuses, there may be toll charges for
use of the phone lines.
For more information on ATI-Net call (209) 278 4872.
Additional information may include crop stress curves,
which are used to identify the point where economic damage begins
to occur in the plant. These crop stress curves can be adjusted
for poor water quality (e.g., salinity).
The irrigation program will schedule irrigations
to maintain maximum economic potential. The field measurements
are correlated to specific fields, acreage size, soil type(s),
crops, irrigation methods, irrigation efficiency, salinity problems,
and historical weather data.
Using this wealth of information, the computer program
is able to sort out and schedule irrigation frequency and amount.
Further allowances for cultural or timing conflicts can be used
to modify the irrigation schedule.
The computer program produces a written report or
recommendation on when and how much to irrigate. This report should
include the length of time a pump or valve needs to operate or
the gross amount of water which needs to be applied and the day
the irrigation should begin . The report will list the fields
according to irrigation priorities.
Many of these reports allow for a written comment
section for verification of soil moisture levels or other pertinent
data.
HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS
The hardware generally required to operate an irrigation
scheduling program includes a personal computer complete with
keyboard and two disc drives (or one disc and one hard drive),
monitor (color optional), and a dot matrix or laser printer. The
price of a basic computer starts around $600 or $700, with the
monitor and printer costing another $300 each. Additional hardware
might include a phone modem that allows the computer to access
local weather information or a weather station located on your
farm.
As for irrigation scheduling software programs, you
will need to spend time surveying the various packages available.
Talk with growers, farm advisors, and others in your area who
have experience with scheduling software. This will provide several
benefits: a more thorough understanding of how a software program
works; an idea of relative ease of operation; and an idea of the
cost of software (some start around $500).
Furthermore, find out about the software vendor's
reputation. Consider the technical support for software installation
and maintenance, and the cost of upgrading your current software
as newer versions are made available.
You will probably want a program that uses your current
method of scheduling as well as offering the advantages of other
techniques. Since irrigation systems and methods vary widely,
it's important that the program be flexible enough to meet your
needs. You may also want to check with your local cooperative
extension office or university for class offerings on selection
and uses of scheduling software. Finally, one should ease into
computerized scheduling by continuing with your past irrigation
practices until you gain confidence with the computer's recommendations.
Once you have come to depend on an irrigation scheduling
program, you may wonder how you ever lived without it. If you
want complete automation, many irrigation scheduling programs
can be connected directly to a central controller. This allows
for direct control of irrigation in the field. This is generally
best suited for pressurized irrigation systems (sprinkler, micro-irrigation,
or drip).
Some benefits derived from this arrangement are the
continual updating of water needs and eliminating the need to
handle and reenter data. However, automation is never a substitute
for getting out in the field and monitoring the crop.
Figure 1.
Shows a computerized irrigation projection from a typical software
package. The sample printout is from the ROY irrigation scheduling
program, courtesy of Orange Software, Fresno, California
| Irrigation
| Applied
| Depth
| | Set
| | | | Crop
| | | Current Moisture
| Cycle
|
| Date
| Net
| Gross
| Duration
| Volume
| Flow
| Stress
| Root
| Coeff
| ET
| Stage
| Level
| Defic
| Resv
| |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | (in
|
| mo/da/yr
| inches
| inches
| hr:min
| 1000 ga
| c.f.s.
| %
| feet
| %
| inches
| Name
| %
| inches
| inches
| Days)
|
| 6/23/86
| 2.86
| 3.36
| 11:10
| 731
| 2.43
| 10.8
| 4.00
| 65.30
| 0.16
| LATE
| 60.30
| 2.86
| 7.20
| 26
|
| 7/11/86
| 2.75
| 3.23
| 10:50
| 703
| 2.43
| 10.3
| 4.00
| 64.40
| 0.16
| LATE
| 61.80
| 2.75
| 7.20
| 18
|
| 7/30/86
| 2.84
| 3.35
| 11:10
| 727
| 2.43
| 10.7
| 4.00
| 63.40
| 0.15
| END
| 60.50
| 2.84
| 7.20
| 19
|
| 8/20/86
| 2.78
| 3.27
| 10:50
| 711
| 2.43
| 10.4
| 4.00
| 62.30
| 0.13
| END
| 61.40
| 2.78
| 7.20
| 21
|
| 9/14/86
| 2.8
| 3.29
| 11:00
| 715
| 2.43
| 10.5
| 4.00
| 60.90
| 0.11
| END
| 61.10
| 2.80
| 7.20
| 25
|
| 10/17/86
| 2.85
| 3.35
| 11:10
| 728
| 2.43
| 10.8
| 4.00
| 59.10
| 0.08
| END
| 60.40
| 2.85
| 7.20
| 33
|
| 12/13/86
| 2.88
| 3.38
| 11:20
| 735
| 2.43
| 10.9
| 4.00
| 56.00
| 0.04
| END
| 60.00
| 2.88
| 7.20
| 57
|
| 12/31/86
| | ---------At Cutoff Day--------
| | 2.05
| 4.00
| 55.00
| 0.04
| END
| 91.10
| 0.64
| 7.20
| 57
|
{ page top }