|
Manufacturers and
sellers of drip irrigation equipment gathered at the Center for Irrigation
Technology (CIT) last month to seek consensus on an issue that has brought
both great interest and some confusion to the industry during recent years.
The issue is emitter plugging and how to test effectively for
it, so that when a manufacturer makes claims about its product, those on the
purchasing end of the process will know they are getting what they pay for.
"We get a lot of questions from growers about which
product is better. How do we answer that?" asked CIT Director David
Zoldoske near the opening of the half-day session, attended by more than 40
representatives of leading drip line and emitter manufacturing companies in
the United States.

Participants at the session agreed that CIT is generally
recognized as the premier entity in California and the United States for fair
and independent testing of all types of irrigation equipment. Agricultural
producers, along with turf and landscape managers, place high value on a
product that has "passed" efficiency or other types of tests
conducted by CIT.
However, a set of universal standards for rating emitter
plugging resistance has remained elusive because of so many variables in drip
irrigation, Zoldoske told participants. With a lack of standards to test
against, buyers have found it difficult to discern which equipment traits
might be best suited to their particular needs. They have often been forced to
base purshasing decisions on unproven claims made by sellers or manufacturers.
"We ought to be able to come up with a procedure to
quanfity those claims if we’re going to make them," Zoldoske said.
Emitter plugging can be caused by the growth of organic
substances such as bacteria or mold, by the accumulation of inorganic matter
such as sand or silt, by the combination of chemical elements such as salts
and minerals, or by combinations of all these. In addition, water temperature,
as well as chemical and organic components of water, differ from region to
region of the country, which further complicates the list of variables.
"Plugging is one of the most difficult problems and the
least quantifiable," concluded one participant.
Over the past two years CIT has conducted a series of
emitter plugging tests focusing on the effect of inorganic particulates in the
water. These tests were done privately under contract from manufacturers and
growers. Problems arose when results were extrapolated beyond the narrow
confines of the test parameters. Some manufacturer representatives at the
meeting suggested that no testing results should be made public until
industry-wide standards have been established.
"Until we have a protocol that we can agree to, we
should agree to suspend [results of] all tests that we have done in the
past," one company rep stated.
The broader consensus of the group was that past tests were
valid for what they were specifically designed, but that manufacturers – and
CIT- have a responsibility to ensure clarity in reporting results.Many
participants asked that CIT assert more control over companies’ use of
private test data. In response, Zoldoske indicated some
changes would be coming.
First, he would begin drafting criteria that could be used
to help control the use of information released to companies funding private
CIT tests. One major issue to be addressed, Zoldoske said, would be the use of
CIT’s name on results of tests that have not been accepted as standard by
the industy.
Secondly, Zoldoske called for the formation of a committee
to develop minimum emitter-plugging standards that can be used by
manufacturers and users. The committee was organized and will work under the
auspices of the Irrigation Association/Micro Common Interest Group.
Thirdly, CIT will place a moratorium on all public plugging
tests until the committee has reached agreement on the issue of standards
development.
Knowing the complexity of emitter plugging issues,
participants agreed that developing standards would be a long-term objective,
and that achievement would probably come in small steps.
"People in the sprinkler industry understand how to use
the data they obtain. If we can get to that level of education in the drip
end, then we will have done our job," Zoldoske said. There
was high interest among the participants to make this type of meeting an
annual event at CIT, Zoldoske said.
{ page top } |