We discussed the need for a state and/or national agricultural industry
strategic plan in the CATI spring Update newsletter. This Update, we will
explore this writer’s vision of the probable California agricultural
landscape changes through the next half-century or so. The only undisputed
given when discussing this topic is that it will look different, probably very
different. Therefore, since only weathermen and economists have the luxury of
consistently making wrong predictions prior to this writing, I consulted with
colleagues whom I hold in high regard both from the educational community and
the industry. Surprisingly, they agreed in part or in total. So here goes.
H.G. Wells once wrote, "those who ignore history are doomed to repeat
it." Therefore, before glancing into the agriculture crystal ball, it’s
probably a good idea to consider events and realities of at least the recent
past and the likely catalysts that will most significantly impact future
change. For the most part, the catalysts are pretty well known. Some are so
new they almost seem like science-fiction, but most are predictable and
manageable while yet others are really based on value judgments. Which
stakeholders’ values are used in developing a strategic plan and/or public
policy becomes a significant issue in and of itself (topic for a different
discussion) and predisposes very different outcomes.
It is important to understand that change itself is not necessarily a bad
thing and that a single action alone rarely causes meaningful change. Rather,
change is brought about by the long-term cause and effect reaction between all
the influencing catalysts. Having said that, however, some are more
influential than others. The three most significant of these in the western
United States are well known to most Californians. They are water, water and
water - agricultural water, urban water and environmental water. Land use
planning, population growth, environmental restoration, bioengineering, food
safety, food security, air quality, expanding export markets and continuously
changing consumer preferences will also dominate the 21st Century
agricultural forefront. But, in the end, water policy is king in California
and the western United States.
The State’s rapidly increasing population, especially in the Central
Valley, and the general public’s continued acceptance of environmental
restoration will progressively intensify the competition for the state’s
limited developed water and developable land. The resulting supply/demand
pressures will progressively drive up the price of both and inevitability out
of profitable reach for the production of many traditional commodities. Add to
this the additional costs of a proliferation of new regulatory requirements,
downward commodity price pressure from domestic surpluses and cheap imports
and continuously changing consumer preferences and expect the industry to
aggressively pursue higher margin alternatives. There will be a slow but
increasing industry migration to high-value high-risk permanent plantings,
vegetables and genetically engineered crops. Producers will also become more
vertically integrated in order to capitalize on value-added processing profits
and to maintain quality control of their products from field to consumer. They
will become marketers of single-serving-size consumer products rather than
bulk commodities.
Change of this magnitude will certainly impact the economic capability of
small, medium and large size farms. Each will survive, at least if we use the
USDA’s definition of a farm. However, clearly a relatively small portion of
large and medium size farms will produce the preponderance of food and fiber
on less land. What each farm will produce and how they will produce and market
their products will differ significantly.
Small farms may increase in number somewhat and will fall into two basic
classifications: very labor intensive specialized high-value truck crops
marketed directly in local markets by extended families or farms, which are,
in essence extended rural residential home sites substantially supported by
off-farm income. Generally, medium-sized farms will continue to diminish in
numbers and be more vulnerable to cost price squeezes and diminishing returns.
Their need to capitalize on value-added processing and marketing returns will
kindle an increased interest in processing and marketing cooperatives and/or
limited liability partnerships to generate economies of scale while
controlling individual members’ financial risk and maintaining their
respective independence. Large farms will become progressively fewer in number
and larger in size as well as more independently vertically integrated.
The good news is that, while California agriculture may look very different
by the end of the next half-century or so, it will survive, it will be vibrant
and it will provide tremendous opportunity on and off the farm for the next
generation of agriculturists. A basic industry strategic plan could be
significantly helpful in charting a course, marking milestones, and providing
for necessary plan adjustments. What do you think?
{ page top }