CATI Logo
Research Publications
Programs & Services
Update Newsletter
Current Projects
Personnel
Student Involvement
Photo Gallery
Related Websites
Announcements & Events
Search CATI
Who We Are & Contact Info

 

logo San Joaquin Experimental Range

Research Notes

The Use of Electronic Identification and Monitoring to Evaluate Feed Consumption, Weight Gain and Feed Efficiency of Feedlot Cattle
by
Randy C. Perry, Michael L. Mosinski
and Michael G. Esra

CATI Publication #970502
© Copyright May 1997, all rights reserved


INTRODUCTION

In the United States, the majority of the beef cattle are fed high concentrate or high grain diets for periods varying from 80 to 150 days prior to being slaughtered. They are fed these high-energy feeds to increase the palatability of the final product beef. Most feedlot cattle are managed, processed, and marketed on a group or pen basis and these pens or groups can be quite large.

When cattle are fed and managed in groups or pens, data concerning feed consumption, cost of gain, and efficiency of gain is only available on a group or pen basis. Similar data concerning individual animals cannot be determined in these situations. Although the feedlot industry operates these production systems very efficiently, tremendous variation exists between animals within a pen or group. In studies of cattle that were very uniform in type and kind, individual animals within a pen or group actually differed in profitability by $169.00 (Gill, 1993) and $151.00 (Wilkes, 1994) per head.

If the beef industry is to compete with other meat industries that are more efficient, such as swine and poultry, then feedlot cattle must be managed and thus monitored on an individual animal basis. The electronic monitoring system that we are developing allows data concerning feed and water consumption, weight changes, feed efficiency, and cost of gain to be collected on a continual basis on individual animals that are being fed in a typical pen or group. Similar systems have been developed and shown to be effective in monitoring a number of different variables under rather large range conditions (Adams et al., 1987).


PROCEDURES

A pen at the California State University, Fresno Beef Unit is being remodeled to accommodate the monitoring system. A typical fence line feed bunk is being remodeled into individual feeding stations. Each station will include a feed trough that is mounted on a load cell with an antenna, and each animal will be equipped with an electronic ear tag that contains its identification number. As the animal enters the feeding station, the antenna will read its number. At the same time a computerized system will record the weight of the feed trough. The antenna will continue to read the animal's number while it is feeding and as it leaves the feeding station. The amount of feed the animal consumes will be determined by comparing the weight of the feed trough when the animal enters and leaves the feeding station.

The feeding and watering areas in the pen are separated by a scale and dividing fence. As animals travel between the feeding and watering areas they must go through the scale. The scale is mounted on load cells and is also equipped with an antenna. The antenna will read each animal's electronic ear tag and the computerized system will record the weight of the animal as it passes through the scale.

The water trough in the pen is equipped with a pressure switch that allows for determination of water consumption. The water area is configured similar to the feeding stations. The animal's ear tag will be read as it enters and leaves the watering area, and the system also will record the amount of the water the animal consumes.

The electronic system that will be used was developed by Texas Instruments and is now controlled and marketed by Allfex USA. A standard computer is equipped with an acquisition card that allows for collection of data from the load cells attached to the feed troughs, from the scale, and from the pressure switch on the water trough. An electronic reader, equipped with a multiplexer that allows the reader to monitor more than one antenna, will monitor or read the antennas on a continual basis.

The computer will record and store all the information from the various inputs. The information will be stored in files along with the time that it was recorded. Eventually the computer will be equipped with a program and artificial language that will allow it to summarize all the data and to determine variables such as daily feed and water consumption, daily weight changes, feed efficiency, and cost of gain.

This system will not only provide information on an individual animal basis, but also on a continual or daily basis. This should allow producers to manage cattle much more efficiently in the feed yard.

From a short-term prospective, once this system is developed, tested and proven accurate in determination of feed efficiency and the other variables, demand for the system and technology should exist from universities and test stations that are involved in performance testing of beef cattle. However, the long-term impact or significance of the project has the potential to mean much more in terms of economics. If a system or method of feeding cattle can be developed that increases the efficiency of feeding cattle by only five percent, the savings to our industry as a whole are in the billions of dollars.

The pen is currently being remodeled, and the various components of the system are being installed. We will test the components and the system during the fall of 1997 and start feeding cattle with the system in early 1998. By the end of 1998, we should have data available concerning the efficiency of using the electronic system for feeding cattle.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Appreciation is expressed to the California Agricultural Technology Institute (CATI) for providing financial assistance for this project.


LITERATURE CITED

Adams, D.C., P.O. Currie, B.W. Knapp, T. Mauney and D. Richardson. 1987. An automated range-animal data acquisition system. Journal of Range Management 40(3):256.

Gill, D. 1993. Mixed market signals may hinder progress. The Oklahoma Cattleman, February 1993 edition.

Wilkes, D. 1994. The Angus Alliance. Integrated Beef Technologies Newsletter, August 1994.

{ page top }

{ CATI , SJER - Research Publications }